Never express concerns about results of your research or your authority. Outside theories do not need to be discussed, as in a research paper in another discipline. Strategies Echoing the introduction: This victory and the conflict from which it emerged would continue to shape American society and politics in the ensuing decades as conservative forces regrouped, and went on the offensive, resulting in the Reagan Revolution of the s.
Do such advertisements contribute to creating an informed electorate or a people who choose political leaders the same way they choose soft drinks and soap? Echoing your introduction can be a good strategy if it is meant to bring the reader full-circle.
This is a brief retelling of all your work. In the conclusion, start narrow by first restating your thesis in different words than in your introduction and showing how you proved it.
On the other hand, if your paper addresses some important social issues, the conclusion will only benefit from your thoughts about the possible use of your research and important needs in this area. To give a better understanding, we should divide the text into 3 basic parts: Future Research A good rule of thumb for scholars is to remember that there is rarely any such thing as a settled argument when it comes to intellectual debates.
Usually, it has to include a brief flashback to the intro of your paper and then provide main results of your research. Further research is needed concerning the question of to what degree the Reagan Revolution of the s was an effective regrouping of conservative forces that suffered defeat during the Nixon presidency, and to what degree the growing conservative militancy of later years paralleled the militancy of the antiwar movement of the late s and early s Observe that the concluding paragraph provided above clearly restates the topic of the paper the role of the antiwar movement in ending American involvement in Vietnam.
If it seems impossible to give a clear answer now, tell your readers what further research is needed, or what actions may help answer this question in the future.
The reader is already familiar with the topic. It may also bring your main ideas together to create a new meaning. Notice that the above paragraph simply states an opinion.
Show them that your paper was meaningful and useful. Warnings Some common problems in the discussion include overloading the reader with too much information, ignoring "negative" results that do not support the original hypothesis or the conclusion that the writer wants to draw, making statements that are too broad and unspecific, drawing conclusions that are not supported by the given evidence and focusing too much on problems and not solutions.
It is not clear from this paragraph what the topic of the paper or its central thesis actually is. The writer might include a reference to additional questions they encountered while writing the paper or conducting the research. My forty-year-old feet ached, and I felt a bit sad to think that in a couple of days I would be leaving California, my vacation over, to go back to my desk.
Avoid repetition and stick to the main points to be made. Note that this part of the introduction is not necessary.
However, in general, the discussion should draw conclusions that are supported by the given evidence, present information in a format that demonstrates the major results, clarify what should not be concluded from the results, explain implications and give suggestions for how to use the information.
It further represented a definitive moment in the generational conflict between young American and their elders that emerged during the s as American participation in the war escalated.
However, other parts of the text are also important. Most often, you will need to just restate your topic and thesis statement. The final clause is usually written only after you have the rest of the paper done to have a complete image of what you have reached in the course of a study; however, a conclusion is one of the most important sections of the work.
The relevance of the problem; Brief review of the theoretical part; Short reminder about goals of your study; The subject and objectives of the study; Data about the used research methods and ways in which they were applied; Final sentences that highlight the obtained results.Looking for some help on how to write a research paper conclusion?
This guide explains the best methods for writing a great conclusion to your paper. Step Research Paper Conclusion. Step 9: Research Paper Rough Draft; 1: Research Question; 2: Types of Papers; A good conclusion to a paper should be at least.
How to Write a Conclusion for a Research Paper. Publication Date: 22 Feb You don’t need to say obvious things to write a good conclusion. Make sure that your thesis is stated not only in the conclusion but also in the introduction and in the body part of your paper.
Your readers must follow your arguments throughout the entire paper. Read about useful tips and exclusive ideas that will help you write a top-notch conclusion for your research paper with ease!
How to Write A Conclusion. In a conclusion paragraph, you summarize what you’ve written about in your paper. When you’re writing a good conclusion paragraph, you need to think about the main point that you want to get across and be sure it’s included.
This handout will explain the functions of conclusions, offer strategies for writing effective ones, help you evaluate drafts, and suggest what to avoid. It is also your opportunity to make a good final impression and to end on a positive note.
Include a provocative insight or quotation from the research or reading you did for your. Writing a conclusion is the final part of the research paper, drawing everything together and tying it into your initial research.
This article is a part of the guide.Download